Journal of Molecular Nanotechnology and Nanomedicine

Study DNA Damage after Photodynamic Therapy Using Silver Nanoparticles with A549 Cell Line

Download PDF

Study DNA Damage after Photodynamic Therapy Using Silver Nanoparticles with A549 Cell Line

Ahmed El-Hussein

The National Institute of Laser Enhanced Science, Cairo University, Egypt

Corresponding author: Ahmed El-Hussein, The National Institute of Laser Enhanced Science, Cairo University, Egypt, E-mail: a.el-husseiny@niles.edu.eg

Citation: El-Hussein A (2016) Study DNA Damage after Photodynamic Therapy Using Silver Nanoparticles with A549 Cell Line. J Mol Nanot Nanom 1(1): 101.

 

Abstract           

 

Lung Cancer is one of the major health problems worldwide. Nanomedicine is considered as one of the promising research applications nowadays. This is due to the unique physical and chemical properties of the nanoscale elements. Silver nanoparticles (Ag NPs) in specific has been extensively studied recently in many biomedical applications especially in cancers, since they possess multifunctional effects that make these nanostructures ideal candidates for biomedical applications. Ag NPs were proved to have anti-tumor activity with apoptotic cell death pathway. The goal of the current work was to investigate the degree of DNA damage that results from the usage of Ag NPs as a photosensitizer (PS) in photodynamic therapy (PDT), besides to evaluate the reactive oxygen species (ROS) yield that was associated. The results showed the occurrence of DNA damage in lung cancer cells (A549) through the generation of ROS via the detection of the mitochondrial membrane potential changes. 

Keywords: Silver nanoparticles; Reactive Oxygen species; DNA damage; Mitochondria membrane potential

Top ↑

Introduction

 

Lung cancer is considered one of the main death causes all over the world. It is believed to be the major account for about 1.6 million deaths, 20% of the total cancer deaths [1]. The effect of this disease has increased lately in Africa due to the tobacco epidemic that resulted in its vast dispersion of this disease [2]. According to the international agency for research on cancer (IARC), smoking alone is attributing for about 65% of lung cancer. Their estimations extend to the appearance of 1.8 million new cases in 2012 where about 60% of this number is only in the developing countries [3]. Eighty five percent of lung cancer patients are diagnosed with either metastasis or advanced local tumors or both. Surgery could be one of the first approaches, but unfortunately it is only valid for 15% of the patients. Bronchoscopic therapy could be the quickest choice and even the only possible choice in  treating  superficial tumors that are found intraluminally and for the treatment of tumors in the main airways as it can cause a rapid symptomatic relief for those patients and hence their overall conditions. This can give the chance for the chemo and/or radio therapeutic treatments to maintain or improve local patients’ conditions [4]. The blockage of the main airways by tumors is the main cause of deaths due to dyspnea and obstructive pneumonia.  However, this approach fails with deep tumors and those who are extension distal to the segmental bronchi. The term tumor resistance is very familiar since high proportion of lung cancers were found to be resistant to conventional combined therapies that eventually can’t compete with tumor recurrence or progression [5]. Thus there was an urgent need to introduce a new approach like photodynamic therapy (PDT) for the treatment of lung cancer.  It took more than quarter of a century for the active application of PDT in the oncology field to gain significant clinical applications for either cancer treatment or skin related diseases. It was believed for this kind of new treatment to cause an outbreak in the treatment protocols due to its selectivity and thanks to the high photosensitizer (PS) affinity to tumor tissue, and the local illumination of the tumor area and finally to the normal tissue regeneration after applying PDT [6]. Yet PDT appeared to have its own limitations that vary from the penetration limit of the light itself, skin sensitivity and the sub therapeutic dose accumulated in the cancerous tissue. These drawbacks hindered the development of this kind of treatment in front of other conventional approaches. Recently, the development of new PS, light sources as well as drug delivery machinery and the activation of the host immune response are all factors that can play an enormous role in increasing the chances of PDT to be applied either alone or combined in the effective treatment of cancer disease. Recently, silver nanoparticles (Ag NPs) have got an increased interest especially after showing in a previously published work the possibility of using them as PS.  Generally, Ag NPs have distinctive characteristics and have applications from ink-jet printing to antimicrobial usage and found to affect neurons and undifferentiated cells [7-9]. In our previous study Ag NPs have been shown to have cytotoxic effect after irradiation with laser light on two cancer lines namely MCF-7 and A549 cells [10]. The mechanism is believed to be photochemical rather than photo-thermal according to the chosen laser parameters. That means that reactive oxygen species have been produced in the vicinity of those cell lines that were responsible for their death.

The aim of the present work was to study closely how Ag NPs mediate their cytotoxicity and if they affect the cells’ DNA or not. Hence a better understanding of their way of action can help in future development in such nanostructures and their applications in PDT alone and/or with combined chemotherapy.

Top ↑

Materials and Methods

 

Cell Culture

Lung cancer (A549) cell lines were originated from the American type Cell Culture (ATCC; Manassas, VA, USA) (ATCC HTB-53). Cell culture growth media were manufactured by Gibco (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). A549 cancerous cells were cultured in Roswell Park Memorial Institute media that was supplemented with 10% Fetal Bovine Serum and 1% penicillin/streptomycin/fungizone (GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences Corp., Piscataway, NJ, USA) with 5% CO2 and at 37°C. Cells were washed by Hank’s balanced salt solution (HBSS; Thermo Fisher Scientific) upon reaching confluency and trypsinized by TrypLETM Express (Gibco®; Thermo Fisher Scientific). Cells were seeded with a concentration of 3×105 in culture dishes of 3.3 cm diameter where they were left 4 hours to attach. Then 3.23 mg/ml of Ag NPs were introduced to those attached cells and left overnight. Laser irradiations with 20 J/cm2 were performed at dark through an optical fiber at room temperature where the laser spot size covered exactly the cells monolayer in the culture plates. The parameters of the used laser were summarized in our previous work [10] and summarized in table 1. The Ag NPs were synthesized at the Institute of Photonic Technology in Jena, Germany. The used Ag NPs have been described in an earlier work [10] where the stock solution was of a concentration 80.884 mg/ml.

Table 1: Parameters of the lasers used in the study

Top ↑

Laser Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy

The Ag NPs that were used in the current study have an absorption peak at 630 nm which is not in the usual absorption spectrum of silver. Laser induced breakdown spectroscopic (LIBS) technique was used to confer more validation about the identity of the used nanoparticles. It is an elemental quazi invasive tool with minimal sample preparation [11]. The setup is described before by Ahmed et al. [12].

Experimental Setup

The current experiment had the setup where cell cultures were divided into four study groups: The first one was used as a control where cells were cultured normally in its nourishing media and with its 5% CO2 supplement; the second group was treated similarly but irradiated with a light dose of 20 J/cm2; the third group was treated as group one but with the addition of 3.23 mg/ml Ag NPs; the last group was the PDT group as the cells of this group had both 3.23 mg/ml Ag NPs and laser irradiation at 20 J/cm2.

ROS Evaluation

Intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) was estimated in all the four experimental groups where 1×105 of A549 cells were plated in 96 well plates accordingly and washed with PBS twice. The cells were then incubated with 10µM 5-(and-6)-chloromethyl-2,7-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate acetyl ester (CM-H2DCFDA) dye at 37?C for one hour. Then, the Fluorescence intensity was measured at 530 nm via the plate reader.

Mitochondrial Membrane Potential Measurements

Moreover, the mitochondrial membrane potential, ΔΨm was needed to be investigated. This parameter gets its importance since it can be used as cell health indicator. JC-1 mitochondrial membrane potential assay kit (Cayman chemical, Michigan, USA), Zeiss confocal microscope and the fluorescence plate reader were used in the current research for such purpose. The physics of that kit relies on the lipophilicity of JC-1 and its cationic nature that can enter the mitochondria in a selective manner where it forms complex called J-aggregates whose color is green upon healthy conditions and otherwise reversibly change its color into red. The assay can be described briefly as follow; The cells from the four experimental groups were plated in 96 well plates at 1×105 cells/ml. 100 µl/ml of JC-1 staining solution is added to each well and mixed gently. The plates were then incubated for 15-30 minutes at 37?C and 5% CO2. The plates were then read using excitation /emission 540/570 nm for healthy cells or 485/535 nm for apoptotic conditions and imaged using Zeiss multi lasers confocal microscope.

Comet assay

Single cell gel electrophoresis was used for the estimation of DNA damages that may be caused through the usage of Ag NPs as a PS in PDT treatment of A549 cell line. The assay was explained in details in an earlier work [13] where a visual assessment to the relative tail intensity using Zeiss upright microscope associated with a CCD camera was done, by sorting 100 comets into classes from 0 (no detectable tail) to 4 (large tail, minimal head), giving an overall damage score of 0–400.

All sets of experiments were repeated four times with duplicate replications of each assay. Origin pro 8 was used as software for performing the one way statistical analysis to get all the mean, standard deviation, and standard error values. P-values were designated for the statistical significance between the control groups and the PDT treated groups with Ag NPs.

Top ↑

Results and Discussion

 

LIBS technique confirmed the elemental constituent of the synthesized nanoparticles to be silver. According to the national institute of standards and technology (NISTA), the spectral line which is at 328.2 nm should be to silver element as shown in figure 1.

Figure 1: LIBS Spectra showing the silver spectral line with high intensity for the synthesized nanoparticles confirming the existence of silver. 

 

The current study proves that PDT mediated cytotoxicity using Ag NPs was found to be via the generation of intracellular ROS as shown in figure 2. Yet the dosage and exposure time are needed to be further studied for their importance and complexity. It is apparent from the figure that the Ag NPs and the laser irradiation alone resulted in non-significant amount of ROS compared to the control group. On the other hand the PDT group generated intracellular biphasic ROS in a significant yield compared to the control group where p < 0.00002.

Figure 2: Different experimental groups stained with Fluorescent 5-(and-6)-chloromethyl-2,7 dichlorodihydrofluorescein  diacetate  acetyl  ester showing the generation of intracellular ROS in the PDT group with significance p < 0.00002 compared to the control group.

 

Many studies like Mukherjee et al. [14] and Bhattacharya et al [15] have reported the generation of such ROS in many cell lines due to the introduction of nanoparticles. Ag NPs can be one of the most prominent candidates in nanomedicine since they are believed to have a big role in the cellular oxidative stress which consequently results in ROS production. The cytotoxicity of Ag NPs has shown by many research centers to be size and shape dependent [16-18]. As long as the size of the Ag NPs decreases, their exposed surface area that can be involved in the biochemical interactions with the cells is increased and hence their cellular effects are elevated by several folds post laser irradiation.  The size of the used Ag NPs in the current study was to be 27 nm and of spherical shape that rendered them to be very relevant and preferable in such kind of applications.

A significant increase in the mitochondrial membrane potential (ΔΨm) in the PDT group was observed when compared to the control group (p < 0.00001) as shown in figure 3 during the tracing of (ΔΨm) in the different experimental groups. Noting that there was no such drastic increase in the mitochondrial membrane potential for the Ag NPs group only nor the laser light only confirming the viability study that has been shown in our previous study [10], where either laser light alone or Ag NPs alone have any toxic effects on A549 cells with the used light intensity and concentration respectively.

Figure 3:  Different experimental groups stained with JC-1 fluorescent dye showing the significant change and hence the mitochondrial membrane potential in the PDT group compared to the control one where p < 0.0001.

 

Confocal microscopic imaging added strength to the above results by showing the green monomer form of the JC-1 fluorescent dye in the case of the PDT experimental group where the other experimental groups have shown the healthy red J aggregates as a result of the complex formation in the mitochondria as shown in figure 4.

Figure 4: Confocal imaging to control, Ag NPs only and laser of 20 J/cm2 only show the healthy red J-aggregates in the mitochondria while the PDT group shows the green J-monomer due to the increased mitochondrial membrane potential.

 

Despite the existence of many pathways for the generation of ROS, one can adopt the mitochondrial generation of ROS pathway via the electron transport chain mechanism [19]. This can be attributed to the correlation between the significance increase in the intracellular ROS and the mitochondrial membrane potential of the PDT group compared to the controls. 

Studying the genotoxicity that may be caused by Ag NPs in the PDT treatment of A549 cells using the comet assay showed a significant DNA fragmentation in the PDT group compared to the control group where p < 0.0001 as shown in figure 5. The increased DNA damage in the PDT group matches perfectly with the previously published results [10], where the viability percentage and cellular proliferation significantly dropped in the PDT treated cells as well as increased levels of Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) which is an indication of increased cytotoxicity.

Figure 5: Comet assay measuring the DNA for the four experimental groups of A549 cancer cells, showing significant DNA damage after PDT treatment compared to the control group (p < 0.0001).

 

There is not yet a confirmation about the sole pathway of the mitochondrial ROS generation in the Ag NPs mediating cytotoxicity. As there might be other cell organelles and pathways that could be involved in these reactions with other probabilities of the presence of increased post oxidative stress after intracellular ROS generation and DNA fragmentation. O’Rourke has investigated the relationship between the change of the mitochondrial membrane potential and ROS generation, where he concluded that the rate of activation of the K+ ion for the oxidative phosphorylation is elevated by increasing the mitochondrial membrane potential and hence increased level of ROS [20]. One proposed mechanism could be estimated from the overall data and from other recent researches [21] that the silver ions which were generated after laser irradiation can intervene with the DNA replication after the induction of ROS and eventually cell death. The produced silver cations may act as oxidative entities by capturing electrons and hence can reduce cellular ATP contents and consequently can be described as cell death effectors through enhancing of ROS production [22]. In our previous work, during characterizing the Zeta potential of the used Ag NPs [10], it was found to have very small value that may results in their aggregation upon protein adsorption on their surface [23,24]. Cho et al. have discussed the effect of Zeta potential and the nanoparticles’ size as a crucial factor on their agglomeration and hence in inducing cellular response and specified a threshold size limit of 50 nm [25]. The current work showed no genotoxicity of the Ag NPs by itself, but after their light absorption they generate ROS with the change of mitochondrial membrane potential that can leads to a serious of reactions that eventually leads in the absence of antioxidant protection to DNA damage and apoptosis [26]. Nevertheless, ROS can be induced via other organelles and pathways, as Golgi, endosomes and lysosomes after cellular exposure to other NPs [27].

Top ↑

 Acknowledgement

 

Acknowledgements are extended to Professor Wolfgang Fritzsche and his research team, Nano Biophotonics Department, Institute of Photonic Technology (IPHT), Jena, Germany for the synthesis and supply of Ag NPs.

Top ↑

References

 

  1. El-Hussein A, Mfouo-Tynga I, Abdel-Harith M, Abrahamse H. Comparative study between the photodynamic ability of gold and silver nanoparticles in mediating cell death in breast and lung cancer cell lines. J Photochem Photobiol B. 2015;153:67-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2015.08.028.
  2. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61(2):69-90. doi: 10.3322/caac.20107.
  3. WHO 2015. Lung Cancer: Estimated Incidence, Mortality and Prevalence Worldwide in 2012. Available from: http://globocan.iarc.fr/old/FactSheets/cancers/lung-new.asp   
  4. Kato H. Photodynamic therapy for lung cancer--a review of 19 years' experience. J Photochem Photobiol B. 1998;42(2):96-9.
  5. Simone CB 2nd, Friedberg JS, Glatstein E, Stevenson JP, Sterman DH, Hahn SM, et al. Photodynamic therapy for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Dis. 2012;4(1):63-75. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2011.11.05.
  6. Agostinis P, Berg K, Cengel KA, Foster TH, Girotti AW, Gollnick SO, et al. Photodynamic therapy of cancer: an update. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61(4):250-81. doi: 10.3322/caac.20114.
  7. Su J, Zhang J, Liu L, Huang Y, Mason RP. Exploring feasibility of multicolored CdTe quantum dots for in vitro and in vivo fluorescent imaging. J Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2008;8(3):1174-7.
  8. Marambio Jones C, Hoek E.M.V. A review of the antibacterial effects of silver nanomaterials and potential implications for human health and the environment. J. of Nanoparticle Reser. 2010;12:1531–1551.
  9. Anna Barbasz, Magdalena O?wieja, Jakub Barbasz. Cytotoxic activity of highly purified silver nanoparticles sol against cells of human immune system. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2015;176(3):817–834. doi:  10.1007/s12010-015-1613-3.
  1. Mfouo Tynga I, Hussein A, Harith M, Abrahamse H. Photodynamic Ability of Silver Nanoparticles in Inducing Cytotoxic Effects in Breast and Lung Cancer Cell Lines. Int J Nanomedicine. 2014;9(1):3771-3780.
  2. El-Hussein A, Kassem AK, Ismail H, Harith MA. Exploiting LIBS as a spectrochemical analytical technique in diagnosis of some types of human malignancy. Talanta. 2010;82(2):495-501. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2010.04.064.
  3. El Hussein A, Marzouk A Harith M.A. Discrimination between different crude oil grades using Laser induced break down spectroscopy. Spectrochim Acta B. 2015;113:93–99.
  4. El-Hussein A, Harith MA, Abrahamse H. Assessment of DNA damage after photodynamic therapy using a metalphthalocyanine photosensitizer. Int J of Photoenergy. 2012;2012. doi:10.1155/2012/281068.
  5. Mukherjee SP, Lyng FM, Garcia A, Davoren M, Byrne HJ. Mechanistic studies of in vitro cytotoxicity of poly (amidoamine) dendrimers in mammalian cells.  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2010;248(3):259-68. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2010.08.016.
  6. Bhattacharya K, Naha PC, Naydenova I, Mintova S, Byrne HJ.  Reactive  oxygen  species  mediated  DNA  damage  in  human  lung  alveolar  epithelial (A549)  cells  from  exposure  to  non-cytotoxic  MFI-type  zeolite  nanoparticles. Toxicol Lett. 2012;215(3):151-60. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2012.10.007.
  7. Carlson C, Hussain SM, Schrand AM, Braydich-Stolle LK, Hess KL, Jones RL, et al. Unique cellular interaction of silver nanoparticles: size-dependent generation of reactive oxygen species. J Phys Chem B. 2008;112(43):13608-19. doi: 10.1021/jp712087m.
  8. Kim TH, Kim M, Park HS, Shin US, Gong MS, Kim HW. Size?dependent cellular toxicity of silver nanoparticles. J. of Biomed. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2012;100(4):1033-43. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.34053.
  9. Morones JR, Elechiguerra JL, Camacho A, Holt K, Kouri JB, Ramírez JT, et al. The bactericidal effect of silver nanoparticles. Nanotechnology. 2005;16(10):2346-53. doi: 10.1088/0957-4484/16/10/059.
  10. Holly R McLennan, Mauro Degli Esposti. The  contribution  of  mitochondrial  respiratory  complexes  to  the  production  of  reactive  oxygen  species.  Journal of bioenergetics and biomembranes. 2000;32:153–162.
  11. Brian O’Rourke. Mitochondrial ion channels. Annu Rev Physiol. 2007;69:19–49. doi:  10.1146/annurev.physiol.69.031905.163804.
  12. Kreuter J, Gelperina S. Use of nanoparticles for cerebral cancer. Tumori. 2008;94(2):271-7.
  13. AshaRani PV, Low Kah Mun G, Hande MP, Valiyaveettil S. Cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of silver nanoparticles in human cells. ACS Nano. 2009;3(2):279-90. doi: 10.1021/nn800596w.
  14. Jeffrey J Gray. The interaction of proteins with solid surfaces. Current Opinion in Structural Biology. 2004;14: 110-115.
  15. Lynch I , Cedervall T , Lundqvist M , Cabaleiro-Lago C , Linse S , Dawson KA. The  nanoparticle-protein  complex  as  a  biological  entity:  a  complex  fluids  and surface  science  challenge  for  the  21st  century. Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 2007;134-135:167-74.
  16. Cho EC, Zhang Q, Xia Y. The  effect  of  sedimentation  and  diffusion  on  cellular uptake  of  gold  nanoparticles. Nat Nanotechnol. 2011;6(6):385-91. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2011.58.
  17. Halliwell B,  Whiteman M. Measuring  reactive  species  and  oxidative  damage in  vivo  and  in  cell  culture:  how  should  you  do  it  and  what  do  the  results  mean?. Br J Pharmacol. 2004;142(2):231–255.       
  18. Jiang Z, Hu Z, Zeng L, Lu W, Zhang H, Li T, et al. The  role  of  the  Golgi apparatus  in  oxidative  stress:  is  this  organelle  less  significant  than  mitochondria?. Free Radic Biol Med. 2011;50(8):907-17. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2011.01.011.

 Top ↑

Copyright: © 2016 Ahmed El-Hussein. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.