Womens Health International

Trichomonas Vaginalis in Hiv-Infected women: A Risk Factor for High Risk Human Papillomavirus

Download PDF

Published Date: August 18, 2014

Trichomonas Vaginalis in Hiv-Infected women: A Risk Factor for High Risk Human Papillomavirus

Ellen M Maher1, Emma Kennedy2 and Gweneth B Lazenby3*


1College of Medicine
2Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, 
3Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology 

*Corresponding Author: Gweneth B. Lazenby, Medical University of South Carolina, Department, of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Internal Medicine Division of Infectious Diseases, 96 Jonathan, Lucas Street, Suite 634, Charleston, SC 29425, Phone: 843.792.6212; Fax: 843.792.0533; Email: lazenbgb@musc.edu.

Citation: Ellen M Maher, Emma Kennedy, Gweneth B Lazenby (2014) Trichomonas Vaginalis in Hiv-Infected women: A Risk Factor for High Risk HumanPapillomavirus. Women Health Int 1(1): 105. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.19104/whi.2014.105

 

Abstract 


Objective: Women with Trichomonas vaginalis (TV) are four times as likely to have high-risk human papilloma virus (HRHPV). TV is more common in HIV-infected women and associated with HIV transmission. This study aimed to describe the association between TV and HRHPV in HIV-infected women undergoing cervical cancer screening. 
Methods: We reviewed the records of 329 HIV-infected women presenting for cervical cancer screening. Chi-squared analysis was used to compare proportions of disease in women with and without HRHPV. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to determine factors associated with HRHPV.
Results: Of women screened for HRHPV, over half were infected (114/210).TV infection was present in 57/257 screened. TV was associated with a 4-fold increase risk of HRHPV (OR, 3.8; 95% CI 1.6-9). Current abnormal pap (OR, 15.9; 95% CI 8.1-31.3) and AIDS (OR, 6.1;95% CI 2.6-14.5)were the most significant risk factors for HRHPV infection.
Conclusions: TV and HRHPV are common infections among HIV-infected women. TV was a significant risk factor for HRHPV infection. The consequence of untreated TV infection may be persistent HRHPV infection and risk of cervical cancer.  
 

Keywords: Trichomonas vaginalis; HIV; High-risk human papillomavirus 

Top ↑

Introduction


Trichomonas vaginalisis a parasitic protozoan that causes vaginitis in women and is the most common treatable sexually transmitted infection (STI) worldwide [1,2] The true prevalence of Trichomonas is likely underestimated due to a lack of reporting, low rates of screening in asymptomatic patients, and the poor sensitivity of microscopy for diagnosis [3,4] Trichomonasinfection affects 3.2% of American women, but non-Hispanic, black women have disproportionately high rates of Trichomonascompared to non-Hispanic, white women (13% vs.1%) [5,6].

Trichomonas infection is linked to significant morbidity in women. Specifically, Trichomonas has been associated with increased rates of preterm delivery, low birth weight in neonates, pelvic inflammatory disease (PID), cervical dysplasia, and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) acquisition and transmission [7-11]. Assuming an association with HIV transmission, one modeling study estimated that Trichomonasvaginitis in women is associated with 6%of new HIV infections among susceptible partners each year in the United States [12].

The prevalence of Trichomonas infection among HIV-infected women is significantly higher than the general population and ranges from 17-63%. [9,13-15]. The highest incidence of Trichomonas infection among HIV-infected women was noted among inner city minority women using drugs [15].

HIV-infected women also have high rates of human papillomavirus (HPV)co-infection [16-18]. HIV-infected women are more likely to have persistent high risk HPV (HR HPV) infections, possibly increasing their risk of developing cervical cancer compared with immunocompetent women [19]. Trichomonas vaginitis has been linked to HR HPV infection in HIV uninfected women [9,20,21]. We aimed to determine an association between Trichomonas vaginitis and HR HPV in HIV-infected women. We hypothesized that Trichomonas vaginitis in HIV-infected women would increase their risk of a HR HPV infection at the time of routine cervical cancer screening. 

Top ↑

Methods 


Size and power calculation Sample 
Our retrospective case-control study was approved by the Medical University of South Carolina Internal Review Board (Protocol #13184).In order to calculate sample size; we assumed that Trichomonas infection increases the risk of HR HPV infection in HIV-infected women by a factor of 4. This is twice the associated rate reported in HIV uninfected women. Assuming a probability of 0.8, 76 subjects (38 cases and 38 controls) were needed to reject the null hypothesis that Trichomonas does not increase the risk of HR HPV infection. The Type I error probability associated with this power calculation was 0.05. Assuming 25% of HIV-infectedwomen have a Trichomonas infection, 304 patient charts would need to be reviewed in order to identify 76 subjectsinfected with Trichomonas. 

Data collection
We reviewed the charts of 329 HIV-infected women who presented for gynecologic and cervical cancer screening between 2006 and 2013. The results of the most recent cervical cancer screening exam for each woman were collected. Cervical cancer screening was performed with liquid based cytology using ThinPrep® Imaging System (Hologic Inc., MA). Additional patient variables collected were: age, race, parity, history of abnormal cervical cytology, prior treatment for cervical dysplasia, hysterectomy, hepatitis B (HBV) and C (HCV) status, and history of other STIs. HBV status was considered positive if the patient was currently or had ever been hepatitis B antigen positive and/or was core antibody positive. Previous treatment for abnormal cervical cytology could include: cryotherapy, cold knife cone, loop excision electrode procedure, and/or hysterectomy. Cervical dysplasia treatment history was obtained from documentation of patient self-report, operative notes, and surgical pathology results. 

Each subject’s record was reviewed for evidence of or report of STIs prior to the most recent cervical cancer screening exam. STIs recorded as part of this study were: herpes simplex virus (HSV), Chlamydia trachomatis (CT), Neisseria gonorrhoeae (GC), external genital warts (EGW), Trichomonas vaginalis, and syphilis. Patient history of STIs was determined by documented patient self-report, previous positive nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs), serologies, cultures, and/or microscopy examination.

Patient characteristics and results of screening tests at the time of the most recent cervical cancer screening exam were recorded. These included: current pregnancy, cervical cytology and histology, HR HPV infection determined by PCR (Cervista HPV high risk assay, Hologic, Inc.) or histology demonstratingcervical intraepithelial neoplasia, bacterial vaginosis (BV) screening,and Trichomonas screening. Any new STI diagnosis at the time of cervical cancer screening was noted.

BV screening was performed using Amsel’s criteria or gram stain (Nugent’s score ?7) [22]. A diagnosis of BV by Amsel’s criteria consists of 3 of the following 4 findings: vaginal discharge, pH greater than 4.5, positive whiff test, and presence of clue cells on microscopy [23]. Trichomonas screening was considered positive if organisms were identified by Gen-Probe APTIMA Trichomonas vaginalis. Assay (San Diego, CA), microscopy, culture (InPouch™ TV test, BioMed Diagnostics San Jose, CA), or cervical cytology (ThinPrep® Imaging System,Hologic Inc., MA). 

To assess HIV status at time of the cervical cancer screening exam, a subject’s HIV RNA viral load (copies/ml) and CD4 cell counts (cells/mm3) within the last year were noted. RNA viral load was recorded as zero copies/ml if the HIV RNA viral load was undetectable using Abbott M2000 Real time PCR test (Abbott Park, Illinois). For subjects on anti-retroviral therapy (ARVs) and/or opportunistic infection prophylaxis (OIP), the rapeuticregimen at the time of the most recent cervical cancer screening exam was recorded. 

Data Analysis
Statistical analyses were performed using SAS version 9.3 (SAS® Software Cary, NC). The mean was calculated for normally distributed continuous variables (age) and the median was calculated for non-normally distributed continuous variables (viral load, parity, and CD4 cell count). Chi-square tests were used to compare the proportion of subjects affected by the outcomes of interest. Odds ratios were determined using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. Variables with a p-value ? 0.2 in univariate analysis were included in the multivariate models. 

Top ↑

Results 


From 2006 to 2013, 329 women presented for cervical cancer screening. The mean age of these women was 44 years (± 11) and the median parity was2.0 (IQR 0-9). Of 329 women, 264 were non-Hispanic, black, 18 were currently pregnant, and 46 had undergone a hysterectomy. More than half of the women had previously had abnormal cervical cytology (188/329). Three-six percent (67/188)of the women with abnormal cytology had been treated for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. 

Many of the women presenting for cervical cancer screening had hada priorSTI (211/329).  HSV (79/211) and Trichomonas (108/211)were the most common historical STIs. At the most recent screening exam, abnormal cervical cytology was present in one third of women (113/329). Almost half of these women underwent cervical biopsies (54/113). Additional patient characteristics recorded are shown in Table 1.

Table 1: Characteristics of HIV-infected women undergoing cervical cancer screening. aPrior treatment for abnormal cervical cytology could include: cryotherapy, cold knife cone, loop excision electrode procedure, and/or hysterectomy. bAIDS defined as CD4 cell count of ? 200 cells/mm3.

 

Eighty-eight percent of the women (291/329) presenting for cervical cancer screening were screened for BV. Of the women screened, one third of women had BV (86/291). The most common STIs present at the time of the cervical cancer screening were Trichomonas (57/329), HSV(5/329) and Chlamydia (5/329).

The median viral load for women in the study was undetectable (IQR 0-1,410,696 copies/mL) and the median CD4 count was 496 cells/mm3 (IQR 7-1746). Less than 20% of subjects (55/329) had AIDS, defined as a CD4 cell count ? 200 cells/mm3. The majority of women reported taking ARVs (283/329) and few required OIP (62/329). The proportion of women taking OIPreflected the number of women with CD4 counts? 200 cells/mm3

Seventy-four percent of women presenting for cervical cancer screening were also screened for Trichomonas (237/329). Of the women screened for Trichomonas using recommended screening techniques (NAATs, culture or microscopy), 15% (37/237) had an infection. Notably, 20 women were incidentally found to have Trichomonas on cytology. When accounting for incidental Trichomonas infection noted on cytology, a total of 57 subjects in the study had Trichomonas infection. 

Over half of the women who were evaluated for HR HPV infection by PCR or cervical biopsies were infected (114/210).One hundred and sixty-eight women were evaluated for both HR HPV and Trichomonas infection at their most recent exam. Of these women, 36 were infected with Trichomonas. The majority of these women were also infected with HR HPV (28/36). Because fewer women than anticipated were screened for Trichomonas and evaluated for HR HPV during the same exam, we identified approximately half of the desired number of subjects (36/76) with Trichomonas infection. 

The results of chi-square analyses comparing patient variables in HIV-infected women with and without HR HPV infection are listed in Table 2. HR HPV infection was strongly related to current abnormal cervical cytology (p=<0.0001) and CD4 count ? 200 cells/mm3 (p=<0.0001). Trichomonas (p=0.001), history of abnormal cytology (p=0.003), black race (p=0.02) and HBV infection (p=0.01) were significantly associated with HR HPV. Age, parity, hysterectomy, BV and other current STIs were not significantly related. A history of other STIs prior to the exam was also not associated with current HR HPV infection. Subjects with a history of Trichomonas (108/329) were more likely to have a history of abnormal cervical cytology (p=0.02). One hundred and eighty-eight women in the study had a history of abnormal Pap smear and of those 38% (71/108) also had a history of Trichomonas infection. 

Table 2. Comparison between HIV-infected women with and without evidence of high risk human papillomavirus during cervical cancer screening. Means were compared using Student’s t-test and reported with standarddeviation. Medians were compared using Mann-U Whitney test and reported with interquartile ranges. Proportions are compared using chisquare analysis and Fischer’s exact tests were applicable. There were nocases of gonorrhea at the time of cervical cancer screening.

 

In a univariate logistic regression analysis, current abnormal cervical cytology was the most significant risk factor for a HR HPV infection (OR 15.9, 95% CI 8.1-31.3).Other factors associated with HR HPV infection in univariate logistic regression models were: CD4 cell ? 200/mm3(OR 6.1, 95% CI 2.6-14.5), Trichomonas infection (OR 3.8, 95% CI 1.6-9), black race(OR 2.3,95% CI 1.1-4.6), history of abnormal cervical cytology (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.2-3.7) and HBV infection (OR 2.9, 95% CI 1.3-6.4).Well-controlled HIV infection, determined by an undetectable viral load, and current use of ARVs decreased the risk of HR HPV by 80% and 60% respectively (OR 0.2, 95% CI 0.1-0.4; OR 0.4, 95% CI0.2-0.9) (See Table 3).

Table 3: Factors associated with high risk human papillomavirus among HIV-infected women. Adjusted OR were determined using multivariate analysis of variables with p-value ? 0.2 in univariate analysis. Adjusted OR for Trichomonasaccounts for patients who were screened.

 

In a multivariate logistic regression analysis controlling for race, history of abnormal cervical cytology, current abnormal cervical cytology, Trichomonas infection, viral load, and CD4 ? 200/mm3,the association between TV and HR HPV was attenuated and no longer significant (OR 2.1; 95% CI 0.7-6.5). In multivariate analysis, race, a history of abnormal cervical cytology and CD4 count ? 200 cells/mm3 were also no longer significantly associated with HR HPV. Current abnormal cervical cytology (OR 14.9; 95% CI 6.9-32.2) and HBV infection (OR 6.2; 95% CI 2-18.9) remained significantly associated with HR HPV in multivariate analysis. An undetectable viral load remained associated with a lower risk of HR HPV infection (OR 0.3; 95% CI 0.1-0.8) but ARV use was no longer significantly associated low risk of HR HPV (See Table 3).

Top ↑

Discussion 


Trichomonas vaginalis infection was associated with a4-fold increased risk of HR HPV infection in our population of HIV-infected women undergoing cervical cancer screening.Twenty-two percent of our subjects had a Trichomonas infection, which is consistent with prevalence data from other studies [13]. Non-Hispanic, black women and those with a CD4 cell count ? 200 cells/mm3 were more likely to be infected with HR HPV compared with other HIV-infected women. When controlling for multiple factors, the association between Trichomonas infection and HR HPV was attenuated. This finding is most likely due to a small sample size of subjects screened for both Trichomonas and HR HPV during the same exam. 

Based on prevalence studies in HIV-infected women, we assumed that 50% of our study population would have a HR HPV infection and 25% would be infected with Trichomonas. These assumptions were consistent with the rates of infection in our population (57% and 22% respectively).  We had anticipated that among 304 women, we would identify 76 women infected with Trichomonas infection who were evaluated for HR HPV infection at a routine cervical cancer screening. However, only 36 eligible women were identified out of 329. 

Presumably, the unexpected low number of subjects screened for both Trichomonas and HR HPV infections is due to the study period. Many of the subjects in this study underwent cervical cancer screening prior to 2010. The release of the CDC Sexually Transmitted Diseases Treatment Guidelines, which recommend annual Trichomonas screening among HIV-infected women, occurred in 2010 [24]. Previous guidelines had not recommended routine Trichomonas screening in any population. The 2010 guidelines made the recommendation for annual screening secondary to the high prevalence of Trichomonas among HIV-infected women [24]. When our study subjects are separated into women screened for HR HPVbefore and after January 2011, the rate of concurrent Trichomonas testing doubles from 43% (61/143) to 80% (149/186). 

Routine HR HPV screening in HIV-infected women 30 years or older with normal cervical cytology is not yet recommended in HIV-infected women. However, there is promising evidence that HIV-infected women with elevated CD4 counts may be candidates for HPV triage screening due to similar rates of disease progression compared to HIV uninfected women [25]. 

Despite inadequate sample size to support our hypothesis, these data give plausibility to an association between Trichomonas vaginitis and HR HPV infection in HIV-infected women. There are several possible mechanisms by which Trichomonas increases the risk of HIV infection. These theories may be applicable to the interaction between Trichomonas and HR HPV infection.  Immunosuppression and inflammation associated with HIV may also potentiate the role that Trichomonas plays in persistent HR HPV infection.

A mechanism by which Trichomonas may increase entry of opportunistic viruses into susceptible host cells is to weaken the mechanical barrier of the vaginal epithelium. A cysteine protease released by Trichomonas inactivates human secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor (SLPI) at the site of infection and triggers cell apoptosis [26,27] Human SLPI is responsible for containing other proteases recruited during an inflammatory response. Without repression by SLPI, inflammatory proteases can degrade surrounding tissue allowing for penetrance of pathologic organisms such as HIV and HR HPV [26,28].

Trichomonas vaginitis leads to significant inflammation of the vaginal epithelium. In the face of increased inflammation from Trichomonas, CD4 lymphocytes are recruited to the site of infection. These cells are susceptible to HIV infection [29]. Trichomonas can engulf HIV-infected lymphocytes and potentially carry HIV past the protective vaginal epithelium [28,30].

In HIV-infected women, genital shedding of the HIV virus is increased in the presence of Trichomonas vaginitis [31]. Trichomonas stimulates IL-8, which activates HIV-replication through TNF? [28]The up-regulation of HIV viral replication and genital shedding could lead to increased HIV transmission to susceptible partners. Given these plausible associations of Trichomonas in the acquisition and transmission of HIV, it is likely that Trichomonas infection increases the risk of other viral STIs such as HR HPV in HIV-infected women. 

HIV immunosuppression combined with inflammation and vaginal epithelial breakdown caused by Trichomonas infection may create an advantageous environment for persistent HR HPV infection. If this relationship exists, routine screening and treatment of Trichomonasin HIV-infected patients, as recommended by CDC, may decrease the risk of persistent HR HPV and ultimately cervical cancer. The goal of diagnosis and effective treatment of Trichomonas vaginitis in HIV-infected women would not only be to reduce potential transmission of HIV but also to decrease the risk of persistent HR HPV infection [24]. By reducing factors that lead to persistent HR HPV infection, HIV-infected women would be less likely to develop squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix. Future studies should investigate the role of effective Trichomonas treatment and control of HIV disease on persistent HR HPV infection. 

Top ↑

References 

 

  1. Johnston VJ, Mabey DC (2008) Global epidemiology and control of Trichomonas vaginalis. Curr Opin Infect Dis 21: 56-64.
  2. Van der Pol B (2007) Trichomonas vaginalis infection: the most prevalent nonviral sexually transmitted infection receives the least public health attention. Clin Infect Dis 44: 23-25.
  3. Nye MB, Schwebke JR, Body BA (2009) Comparison of APTIMA Trichomonas vaginalis transcription-mediated amplification to wet mount microscopy, culture, and polymerase chain reaction for diagnosis of trichomoniasis in men and women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 200: 188 e1-7.
  4. Schwebke JR, Burgess D (2014) Trichomoniasis -Clinical microbiology reviews 17: 794-803.
  5. Allsworth JE, Ratner JA, Peipert JF (2009) Trichomoniasis and other sexually transmitted infections: results from the 2001-2004 National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys. Sex Transm Dis 36: 738-744.
  6. Sutton M1, Sternberg M, Koumans EH, McQuillan G, Berman S, et al. (2007) The prevalence of Trichomonas vaginalis infection among reproductive-age women in the United States, 2001-2004. Clin Infect Dis 45: 1319-1326.
  7. Frost JK (1962) Trichomonas vaginalis and cervical epithelial changes. Ann N Y Acad Sci 97: 792-799.
  8. Laga M, Manoka A, Kivuvu M, Malele B, Tuliza M, et al. (1993) Non-ulcerative sexually transmitted diseases as risk factors for HIV-1 transmission in women: results from a cohort study. AIDS 7: 95-102.
  9. Mavedzenge SN, Pol BV, Cheng H, Montgomery ET, Blanchard K, et al. (2010) Epidemiological synergy of Trichomonas vaginalis and HIV in Zimbabwean and South African women. Sex Transm Dis 37: 460-466.
  10. Mayer KH, Venkatesh KK (2011) Interactions of HIV, other sexually transmitted diseases, and genital tract inflammation facilitating local pathogen transmission and acquisition. Am J Reprod Immunol 65: 308-316.
  11. McClelland RS, Sangare L, Hassan WM, Lavreys L, Mandaliya K, et al. (2007) Infection with Trichomonas vaginalis increases the risk of HIV-1 acquisition. J Infect Dis 195: 698-702.
  12. Chesson HW, Blandford JM, Pinkerton SD (2004) Estimates of the annual number and cost of new HIV infections among women attributable to trichomoniasis in the United States. Sex Transm Dis 31: 547-551.
  13. Sorvillo F, Kovacs A, Kerndt P, Stek A, Muderspach L, et al. (1998) Risk factors for trichomoniasis among women with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection at a public clinic in Los Angeles County, California: implications for HIV prevention. Am J Trop Med Hyg 58: 495-500.
  14. Sorvillo F, Smith L, Kerndt P, Ash L (2001) Trichomonas vaginalis, HIV, and African-Americans. Emerging infectious diseases 7: 927-932.
  15. Miller M, Liao Y, Gomez AM, Gaydos CA, D'Mellow D (2008) Factors associated with the prevalence and incidence of Trichomonas vaginalis infection among African American women in New York city who use drugs. J Infect Dis 197: 503-509.
  16. Cu-Uvin S, Hogan JW, Warren D, Klein RS, Peipert J, et al. (1999) Prevalence of lower genital tract infections among human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-seropositive and high-risk HIV-seronegative women. HIV Epidemiology Research Study Group. Clin Infect Dis 29: 1145-1150.
  17. Dartell M, Rasch V, Kahesa C, Mwaiselage J, Ngoma T, et al. (2012) Human papillomavirus prevalence and type distribution in 3603 HIV-positive and HIV-negative women in the general population of Tanzania: the PROTECT study. Sex Transm Dis 39: 201-208.
  18. Chaturvedi AK, Madeleine MM, Biggar RJ, Engels EA (2009) Risk of human papillomavirus-associated cancers among persons with AIDS. J Natl Cancer Inst 101: 1120-1130.
  19. Bodily J, Laimins LA (2011) Persistence of human papilloma virus infection: keys to malignant progression. Trends Microbiol 19: 33-39.
  20. Noel JC, Fayt I, Romero Munoz MR, Simon P, Engohan-Aloghe C (2010) High prevalence of high-risk human papillomavirus infection among women with Trichomonas vaginalis infection on monolayer cytology. Arch Gynecol Obstet 282: 503-505.
  21. Ghosh I, Ghosh P, Bharti AC, Mandal R, Biswas J (2012) Prevalence of human papillomavirus and co-existent sexually transmitted infections among female sex workers, men having sex with men and injectable drug abusers from eastern India. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 13: 799-802.
  22. Nugent RP, Krohn MA, Hillier SL (1991) Reliability of diagnosing bacterial vaginosis is improved by a standardized method of gram stain interpretation. J Clin Microbiol 29: 297-301.
  23. Amsel R, Totten PA, Spiegel CA, Chen KC, Eschenbach D, et al. (1983) Nonspecific vaginitis. Diagnostic criteria and microbial and epidemiologic associations. Am J Med 74: 14-22.
  24. Workowski KA, Berman SM (2011) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Sexually Transmitted Disease Treatment Guidelines. Clinical infectious diseases 53: S59-63.
  25. Keller MJ, Burk RD, Xie X, Anastos K, Massad LS, et al. (2012) Risk of cervical precancer and cancer among HIV-infected women with normal cervical cytology and no evidence of oncogenic HPV infection. JAMA: the journal of the American Medical Association 308: 362-369.
  26. Draper D, Donohoe W, Mortimer L, Heine RP (1998) Cysteine proteases of Trichomonas vaginalis degrade secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor. J Infect Dis 178: 815-819.
  27. Sommer U, Costello CE, Hayes GR, Beach DH, Gilbert RO, et al. (2005) Identification of Trichomonas vaginalis cysteine proteases that induce apoptosis in human vaginal epithelial cells. The Journal of biological chemistry 280: 23853-23860.
  28. Guenthner PC, Secor WE, Dezzutti CS (2005) Trichomonas vaginalis-induced epithelial monolayer disruption and human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) replication: implications for the sexual transmission of HIV-1. Infect Immun 73: 4155-4160.
  29. Levine WC, Pope V, Bhoomkar A, Tambe P, Lewis JS, et al. (1998) Increase in endocervical CD4 lymphocytes among women with nonulcerative sexually transmitted diseases. The Journal of infectious diseases 177: 167-174.
  30. Rendon-Maldonado J, Espinosa-Cantellano M, Soler C, Torres JV, Martinez-Palomo A (2003) Trichomonas vaginalis: in vitro attachment and internalization of HIV-1 and HIV-1-infected lymphocytes. J Eukaryot Microbiol 50: 43-48.
  31. Kissinger P, Amedee A, Clark RA, Dumestre J, Theall KP, et al. (2009) Trichomonas vaginalis treatment reduces vaginal HIV-1 shedding. Sexually transmitted diseases 36: 11-16.

Top ↑

Copyright: © 2014 Gweneth B Lazenby et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permitsunrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.